10/3/96


Hello All,

I would appreciate some pointers from anyone who is familiar with

fixation of cultured cells to be subsequently used immunogold

labeling. I have tried using 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1%

glutaraldehyde in PBS @ pH7.4 but the cell morphology was quite

chewed up. Thanks for your help.

Philomena Kaan

UBC Pulmonary Research Laboratory

St. Paul's Hospital

Vancouver, B.C.

PKaan@prl.pulmonary.ubc.ca


Hi!

I suggest that you increase the concentration of glutaraldehyde to 1%. (4%

PFA + 1% GA).

When I fix cultured cells, I heat the fixative to 37 degr. C, and fix the

cells taken directly out of the chamber -after one wash with buffer of the

same temperature -(if they're not free-floating). I let them cool down in RT

for a while, and then put them in the fridge for a couple of hours / over

night. On the other hand; when you embed the cells in plastic that is

suitable for immuno-gold staining + omit the osmium treatment, you don't

really see what you're used to...

Good luck!

Margareta.Halin@ah.slu.se

Dept. of Anatomy and Histology

Sveriges LantbruksUniversitet


For cultured human colon adenocarcinoma cells, I use

2% freshly depolymerized paraformaldehyde (NOT formalin!)

70 mM NaCl

30 mM HEPES

5 mM CaCl2

pH 7.4

Cells like divalents (Ca2+) around during fixation.

The osmolarity needs to account for the initial contribution of the

aldehydes (a tricky situation since they are somewhat permeable but this

increases with time.

The infiltration into plastic should be gradual (2:1 and 1:1 solvent:resin).

Thomas E. Phillips, Ph.D.

Associate Professor of Biological Sciences

Director, Molecular Cytology Core Facility

3 Tucker Hall

University of Missouri

Columbia, MO 65211

(573)-882-4712 (voice)

(573)-882-0123 (fax)

tphillips@biosci.mbp.missouri.edu


However, be aware that glutaraldehyde can reduce or destroy some

antigenic sites. The general rule is that the higher the glutaraldehyde

concentration, the better the ultrastructure, but the worse the

immunostaining. The only way to know if your particular antigen remains

active after glut is to try it. Usual percents used range from about 0.1

to 1%, mixed with paraformaldehyde (4-8 %). Also, sometimes staining

decreases with increased storage of specimens in aldehydes, even

formaldehyde. If you're starting with an unknown, your best bet is to

keep the glut low (we don't use it), and the fixation time short (1-2

hrs). Then you can test to see if more glut, longer fixation times, or even

osmium fixation (not usually used except in freeze substitution), can be

tolerated. Margareta's statement that the ultrastructure of

non-osmicated tissue is not what you're used to seeing is very true.

Maybe your cells aren't chewed up--just not stained conventionally.

Sara E. Miller, Ph. D.

P. O. Box 3020

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, NC 27710

Ph: 919 684-3452

FAX: 919 684-8735

saram@acpub.duke.edu


Hello,

If the cells are to be post embed labelled I would worry about too strong

of fixation in fear of loosing the immunolabelling capacity.

You might try a 2-4% para in sorensons (so there is no NaCl in the

formula) or a combination of para and picric acid in sorensons buffer such

as a Zamboni fixative, if you are post embed labelling on sections.

We have noticed a problem when there is NaCl present in the fix, with poor

morphology.

Bob

Morphology Core

Derm

U of Wash

Seattle

underwoo@u.washington.edu


You might try using a different buffer -- I've never had very good

results fixing in PBS. We generally use 3% freshly (that's important)

depolymerized formaldehyde and 0.05% glut. in a modified Hanks buffer.

The more glut. your antigens will tolerate, the better. To get the

membrane contrast closer to what you are used to seeing by

conventional EM,try en bloc staining with Uranyl Acetate (which can help

to improve the retention of antigenicity) and Tannic Acid (which can

reduce antigenicity, so try some tissue +TA and some -TA). The

composition of the modified Hanks fixative and protocols for en bloc

staining can be found in:

J. Histochem. Cytochem. 40:845-857 '92.

There is (are?) a myriad of protocols for immunoEM. I sort of

inherited this one and found it to work very well for many cell types and

antigens, using either LRGold or Lowicryl K4M resins.

Happy Labeling!

Greg Martin

gmartin@welchlink.welch.jhu.edu

Dept. Cell Biology and Anatomy

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine


Hello folks,

Here's a tip that will help your unosmicated/immunostained sections look

more aesthetically pleasing. After you have immunostained your

sections, presumably they are on nickel or gold grids, run the grids

through a series of droplets which parallel a routine fixation: hard fix

in 1-2% GA, buffer washes, OsO4, washes, UA, wash, blot dry and scope.

You need only incubate for 10-15 min. in the fixes and 5 min. in the

washes and so on. I've done this with LR White and Lowicryl and it

works well. My colleagues see fine structure which more closely

resembles "routinely" fixed TEM specimens and have their imunno-gold

staining as well. Kind of like having your pie and eating it too. Try

it - you'll like it!

Cheers,

John Aghajanian

Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research

JOHNA@SCI.WFBR.EDU


[Return to Tips & Tricks Menu]